Date: February 22, 2023
Host: Jim Schneider
Guest: Mat Staver
MP3 | Order
Nearly a year ago, Crosstalk conducted several interviews with multiple guests about a very dangerous World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty that would require the U.S. to surrender its sovereignty to this organization. President Biden had offered various amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations, but fortunately, all 13 failed. Crosstalk warned listeners that this was only a pause in their efforts. This program is our way of letting you know that the pause has ended and the WHO is meeting right now, discussing more radical amendments.
Returning to Crosstalk to bring the latest details on the WHO’s efforts was Mat Staver. Mat is the founder & chairman of Liberty Counsel. Mat is a constitutional attorney with three landmark cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. He is an author and the host of the radio broadcasts Faith & Freedom and Freedom’s Call.
President Biden is supporting amendments to what’s called the International Health Regulations. George W. Bush was actually the one who signed the U.S. on to this in 2005. He used the fact that we were a member of the WHO as the reason to sign on to this international health agreement and he bypassed Congress to do so. The amendments at that time were merely recommendations and not binding. The new amendments being proposed, which President Biden wants to sign off on with his pen and again bypass Congress, would change the WHO from a recommendation agency to a binding legal authority on all member nations.
This would allow the WHO the ability to use mandatory global authority to regulate everything that they deem to be within the realm of public health, even if it only has the potential to do so. This means that under this scenario, the WHO would be able to impact many aspects of your life from healthcare, to food, and even your faith as they seek to push an agenda of diversity, equity (not the same as equality) and inclusion.
In essence, as Mat communicated, the WHO would actually be a type of one-world/centralized government under the leadership of the director of the organization. Find out more about how and why they intend to do this as he reads from their very own documents.